Chris Wallace attacks NRA head Wayne LaPierre

FOX News Sunday host Chris Wallace became incredibly confrontational during an interview with National Rifle Association Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre on Sunday, calling his positions “nonsense” and “ridiculous.”

Early on, Wallace struck a combative tone, refusing to let LaPierre explain his position.

“Can I tell you what I think will work for just one second though?” the NRA head asked.

“I’m going to ask you a couple of questions, and we’ll get to it,” Wallace responded harshly. “Forgive me, sir. I’m going to conduct the interview.”

During the show, Wallace also criticized the NRA’s attack ad against President Obama, asking LaPierre if he regretted releasing the ad and chastising him for mentioning the President’s children.

“They face a threat most children do not face,” Wallace argued.

“Tell that to people in Newtown,” LaPierre countered.

“Do you really think the President’s children are the same kind of target as every school child in America?” Wallace asked angrily. “That is ridiculous and you know it, sir.”

Wallace also took offense to the NRA ad singling out the elite with private security.

“The idea of an elite class, it is nonsense, sir,” the host said.

“Capitol Hill, right now, they are all protected by armed security, with high-capacity magazines while they sit there and try to limit the average citizen to ten, because they think that that is reasonable in their opinion,” LaPierre answered.

This isn’t the first time Wallace has become extremely confrontational with a guest on his show. Back in September, during the 2012 election cycle, Wallace became heated with then-GOP Vice Presidential nominee Paul Ryan.

Comments

Comments

  1. Eric Coddington says:

    William Wallace would shoot great balls of fire out of his ______ over this
    stupid out of context attempt to use wrong methods to resolve a security
    matter! People who want to hurt others do not care about regulations and
    laws! They will use any thing they can get their hands on to do their evil
    deeds. Just like those who try to justify more gun laws the law breakers do
    not care and they know when caught they do not stand a chance and thus
    many times take their own life. So knowing that is the way it is now and always
    been like Bonnie and Clyde and any one bent on harming others! It is far
    worst to sit and lie and when the subject of the need to help those with these
    issues mentally the subject quickly gets changed. People want our help and
    how does ignoring that fact and making more rules that do not work get the
    help troubled people need. The greatest prejudice in our Country today is
    we turn our back on others way before they get in trouble because we are to
    busy or do not want to take time and listen and invest time to help, and it is not
    a perfect science help does not always work, but what does not caring and being
    unwilling to invest a little of our time say? Many have asked for mentally challenged
    to be more respected to give them a hope and a little of our busy life to send
    a message we care ! ?? Many of these people just want to be heard and loved
    and to feel normal in a world that can at times be hard to find normal!

  2. McGirv says:

    Wallace has revealed himself to be another elitist progressive Obama sycophant !

  3. copper says:

    Wallace needs to pay closer attention. I, for one, agreed with the add. It isn’t just Obama’s kids going to the well protected Friendship School, it’s Biden’s grandkids, Clinton’s daughter, Gore’s son and David Gregory’s kids. He misses the point when these kids are protected by armed security at their schools but Obama balked at having armed officers at other schools. Does Wallace realize that the other schools in the Sandy Hook district had school resource offices except the grade school and they have just voted to pave the way for more officers . Does Mr. Wallace realize that just a few days ago in Atlanta a school resource officer shot a school shooter saving untold lives? Does Mr. Wallace realize that just a few days ago a 70’s something year old basketball coach defended himself and two female players he was walking to their cars when they were attacked?
    There is an elitist attitude in this country and Mr. Wallace and his co-horts have helped create it by not bringing issues to the forefront of the news. To many times the press wants to give a “pass” for a favorable interview down the road or maybe for their own political beliefs. How can you explain the American taxpayer paying for million dollar vacations for MIchelle Obama when she lists her kid as “senior staff”. Did Mr. Wallace report that? Why was it necessary to fly Obama to Colorado just a few days ago at the cost of thousands of dollars simply for a speech to be delivered from there on gun control. Couldn’t give that from Washington? There is no “Office” of the First Lady, Mr. Wallace. That was a term coined by Carter’s wife but it has no true meaning nor does “First Lady”.
    My kids and my grandkids are just as important as theirs. You want to do something, report all the abuse.

  4. Ladymudd says:

    I’m very confused over the interview…as in, I am pissed.

  5. crazymensa says:

    The issues that need to be addressed that would more likely lessen violence of any kind are the issues that will never be addressed by politicians and the media: violence born as a result of parental neglect (and there are many reasons for that); lack of culpability for one’s actions; lack of empathy for others; need for instant gratification; egocentric adults (and children); class warfare; the list goes on. When boundaries aren’t set (for children and adults), life becomes a selfish, hedonistic existence. People with that lifestyle or way of thinking aren’t going to follow the law, because they don’t care. Obviously, items that can cause death must be handled responsibly, just as the privilege to drive cars. Getting to the real problems are the only way to significantly diminish violence. Wallace and the rest who pontificate about gun control would do more of a service to report about policies that undermine having a healthy economy,and the freedom to make choices regarding family (rather than the govt).

  6. george kamburoff says:

    Don’t we have enough guns now?

    Go read how many folk died yesterday because of guns, including the 18 veterans who kill themselves everyday.

    What is missing in those who need man-killers to be equal to the rest of us?

  7. george kamburoff says:

    Are only posts with right-wing sympathies allowed here?

    I posted a rational statement, and it has failed to appear.

    This may explain why the conservatives are so far out-of-touch with real Americans.

  8. Wallace is a man in search of easy, pat solutions, so as to avoid the need to give any real thought to the issue. That he didn’t allow LaPierre to explain his answers to the questions is confirmation that he has an agenda and viewed the ‘interview’ as an opportunity to attack LaPierre.

    Wallace betrayed his journalistic obligations to the public in believing that he has a superior knowledge of the truth of the issue and is obligated to convince the public of his view.

    It’s known as agenda journalism and after this incident and the prior antagonistic interview with Paul Ryan its safe to conclude that Wallace practices his own version of agenda journalism when the subject dictates. How disappointing but typical of Fox regular hosts, where the norm is ‘B’ grade intellectual exploration of the issues.

  9. Chillguy33 says:

    Chris Wallace is a moral degenerate who casts a dark pall over Fox News – worse than Shep Smith.

  10. Dawn Garini says:

    I absolutely can not believe Chris Wallace is drawing a paycheck as a reporter. He simply used Wayne LaPierre’s presence to voice his own clearly pro-gun control opinions. If I was his boss, I would have fired him the second he walked out from that interview.

  11. wtf says:

    Amazing– you people are like caricatures of Fox News watchers — but you are actual people! Wow. I know it is pointless to try to “reason” with anyone here, because this is really about emotions. But I can’t help myself.

    To the point that “people who want to hurt others do not care about regulations and laws!” — I suppose then we should have no laws against murder? After all murderers don’t care about laws, so it wouldn’t make any difference, right? But wait, the laws allow us to prosecute and punish those who murder, removing them from the streets and acting as a deterrent against others who might do the same. Just think about it…..

    Also, I love the people who cite anecdotal evidence: “Does Mr. Wallace realize that just a few days ago a 70′s something year old basketball coach defended himself and two female players he was walking to their cars when they were attacked?” Yes, true. But the US averages 87 gun deaths a day, my friend. And people love to point out that the statistics don’t show how many people are saved by guns every day. True — that’s hard to judge, because you have to *know* they were going to die otherwise. But then I would argue, the statistics also don’t show how many people are saved by *NO* guns being around. I would imagine a lot more people are saved by that. Like just now, I was saved by no guns being anywhere near me. Wait….it just happened again. Saved.

    Just to play devil’s advocate, if you oppose assault weapon regulation, why not other weapons? The same argument seems to dictate we should be allowed to have hand grenades, rocket launchers, tanks. Why shouldn’t I be able to have a nuclear missile in my backyard? What’s the fundamental difference? How about 10 tanks? 100? Can I form an army?

Polititainment

'SNL' laughs at North Korea, Sony hacks
“Saturday Night Live” hit on North Korea and the Sony hacks twice this weekend, proving that unlike most of Hollywood, they aren’t scared of Kim Jong-un. The show started off with a bang, bringing back Mike Myers as Dr. Evil to interrupt the cold open and discuss his anger over the North Korea and Sony hacker […]
RNC asks theaters to show 'The Interview
The Sony hack and subsequent cancellation of “The Interview” has gone fully political. President Obama made an official statement on this decision and now the Republican National Committee is weighing in. RNC Chairman Reince Priebus asks that movie theaters not bow down to North Korea and stand up to this decision by screening the film […]
Obama: LeBron 'did the right thing'

President Obama supports LeBron James' decision to wear an "I can't breathe" t-shirt during warmup before the NBA game between the Cleveland Cavaliers and Brooklyn Nets last week.

Al Sharpton, Hollywood's Sony Liaison

In a private meeting with Rev. Al Sharpton at the Greenwich Hotel in New York City Thursday, Sony Pictures chair Amy Pascal told Sharpton that he could have a voice in how the movie studio makes its films.

Clooney: Release 'The Interview' online

George Clooney may have the most awesomely toothy response to the Sony Pictures cyberattack that forced the movie studio to pull the film "The Interview" from its December 25 release.

White House

Obama: I will do ‘everything I can’ to close Guantanamo Bay
President Obama may have signed the defense bill that keeps Guantanamo Bay open for another year, but he is still verbally promising to close down the facility. Obama appeared on CNN’s “State of the Union” Sunday and discussed closing Gitmo by the end of next year with host Candy Crowley. “I’m going to do everything […]
Obama: ‘We’re not going to be intimidated’ by Sony hackers
President Obama appeared on CNN’s “State of the Union” Sunday morning and covered a variety of topics ranging from racism to North Korea and the Sony hacks. Obama repeated his earlier statements about the hacks, implying again that Sony made the wrong call by canceling screenings of “The Interview.” “The Boston Marathon suffered an actual […]
Obama: we can’t have censorship subject to ‘some dictator someplace’

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama declared Friday that Sony "made a mistake" in shelving a satirical film about a plot to assassinate North Korea's leader, and he pledged the U.S. would respond "in a place and manner and time that we choose" to the hacking attack on Sony that led to the withdrawal. The FBI blamed the hack on the communist government.

U.S. confirms North Korea was behind Sony attack and promises ‘proportional’ response

Officials no longer merely suspect North Korea to be behind the cyberattack on Sony Picture—they’ve confirmed it.

District court declares Obama’s executive action on immigration unconstitutional
A federal court in Pennsylvania declared parts of President Obama’s executive actions on immigration unconstitutional Tuesday. Judge Arthur J. Schwab, sitting in the western district of Pennsylvania, said presidents do have the power to use discretion in deciding how to enforce laws, but found that Obama’s recent executive action went much further than that.  He said Obama was writing […]

Congress

Rubio, Paul feud continued on ABC's 'This Week'
Likely 2016 presidential hopefuls Marco Rubio and Rand Paul have been going after each other all week for statements made on President Obama’s decision to normalize relations with Cuba and the feud did not take a break over the weekend. The Florida senator, one of the most outspoken critics of the new Cuba policy, appeared on […]
Rubio says Rand Paul is clueless on Cuba

Sen. Marco Rubio made his criticism of a fellow Republican plain Thursday night.

Gowdy's office responds to Speaker chatter

Rep. Trey Gowdy has become a sensation on the Right, with his no-nonsense style and committee hearing takedowns of Obama officials garnering him praise and attention.

Rand Paul: 'Opening up Cuba is a good idea'

Sen. Rand Paul broke with the Republican Party's prevailing argument against President Obama's Cuba policy Thursday, saying the move toward opening trade with the long-embargoed nation "probably" is a good idea.

Retiring DemHenry Waxman's farewell ode to govt

You'd think that, 40 years in, a congressman might grow cynical about the prospects of government meddling. Not retiring Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.)!