President Obama’s casting of Mitt Romney as extreme is one of the most glaring incidents of political projection in the modern era. Romney doesn’t approach extremism in substance, style or disposition. Obama swims in it.
In an interview with The Associated Press, Obama said Romney has locked himself into “extreme positions” on economic and social issues and would implement them if in office.
Accusing Romney of extremism is just another arrow in Obama’s fantasy quiver, because reality just doesn’t help him. Romney is anything but extreme, and no serious political analyst believes otherwise. He is certainly extremely bullish on America, American business and the free enterprise system, and he doubtlessly wants to move the nation extremely away from the disastrous course on which Obama is taking it, but that’s about the extent of his extremism. Romney’s policies are right of center, to be sure, but not extreme, except from the perspective of a radical leftist, which brings us to Obama.
Let’s use Obama’s bill of particulars against Romney as a yardstick to measure his own place on the political spectrum — as if it weren’t painfully obvious.
Obama says Romney is locked into extreme positions on economic issues because Romney favors across-the-board tax cuts that “would mostly help the rich.”
Obama discredits himself in the very words of his charge. If the cuts are across-the-board, they don’t mostly favor the rich. In fact, Romney — to my disappointment, by the way — is suggesting reducing deductions for upper-income earners. Obama, on the other hand, apparently believes that the bottom 49.5 percent of income earners are getting ripped off because they are paying zero income taxes. He must think his actions in expanding the public sector, increasing the food stamp rolls and removing the work requirement for welfare are moderate.
Read more at Townhall