Sen. Ben Cardin: Voter ID Laws are the Jim Crow laws of our time

After attending progressive activist conference Netroots Nation this weekend it’s clear Democrats have no intent of stopping their misinformation campaign on the purpose of Voter ID laws.

Democratic Congressman on the conference’s Voter ID panel reiterated claims that Republican-led efforts to enact laws requiring American citizens to present a valid photo ID in order to vote are inherently racist and intended to keep minorities, specifically blacks and Hispanics, from exercising their right to vote.

“This is about them trying to snatch our power away,” said Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn), who is a co-chair of the House progressive caucus.

Ellison predicted that Voter ID would be the most important issue in the 2012 election, then corrected himself after complaints from the audience and said it “is among the most important issues in the 2012 election” Reelecting President Barack Obama is priority number one, he clarified.

Though Ellison is known for his often extreme and controversial behavior, his comments were not as radical as fellow panelist and Democratic Senator Ben Cardin’s, who claimed “[Voter ID] laws are the new Jim Crow laws of our time.”

Cardin, who represents Maryland in the Senate, is the second Democrat in the last 10 days to reassert claims that that Voter ID laws – which aim to ensure that only American citizens vote in American elections – are similar to segregationist era laws that required African Americans to take complicated literacy tests and pay unreasonable “poll taxes” to vote.

On MSNBC’s Hardball with Chris Matthews Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) claimed on May 30 that Voter ID “is like a poll tax – it’s almost like a literacy test.” Lewis also called the laws “a sin” and said they were “obscene.”

Democratic National Committee Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Shultz (D-Flor.) was ridiculed in June of last year for claiming voter ID laws are “very similar to a poll tax” and that Republicans “want to literally drag us all the way back to Jim Crow laws and literally – and very transparently – block access to the polls to voters who are more likely to vote for Democratic candidates than Republican candidates.”

Wasserman-Shultz immediately walked back her claims, saying “Jim Crow was the wrong analogy to use,” and her original claims were swiftly debunked by fact-checking website Politifact.

Nevertheless, other Democrats have persisted in claiming that the GOP’s true aim is to disenfranchise black voters.

Democrats’ dangerous efforts to rekindle comparisons of Voter ID laws to Jim Crow laws has went largely unnoticed by both mainstream media and conservative media outlets as of late. While President Obama is waging a class war in America, fellow Democrats are cranking up their efforts to wage a race war, and conservatives are not fighting fire with fire.

Francesca Chambers About Francesca Chambers

Francesca is the Editor of Red Alert Politics - an online publication written by and for young conservatives. Red Alert Politics is a product of Clarity Media Group, the parent company of The Washington Examiner and The Weekly Standard. She is also a contributor to The Washington Examiner.

Francesca is a veteran of several political campaigns and political organizations. She has also worked in new media and communications at The Leadership Institute, at the Republican National Committee and on Capitol Hill. She has been featured as a speaker at Leadership Institute, Cato Institute, Americans for Prosperity's "Defending the American Dream Summit," the State Policy Network's annual conference and CPAC, in addition to appearing as a regular guest on the "Big Picture" with Thom Hartmann on Russia Today.

She has also appeared on ABC's "Nightline", PBS' 'NewsHour', PBS' "To the Contrary", MSNBC, CNN, on TheBlazeTV (aka Glenn Beck TV) and had radio segments on Take Action News with David Shuster, NPR and "The Michael Koolidge Show."

In 2012 she was named to the DC GOP's first ever "35 under 35" list.

Francesca graduated from the University of Kansas with BAs in Political Science and Journalism. At KU she was an editor of the University Daily Kansan and an active member of Student Senate.

Comments

  1. Rich K says:

    As in most political issues, one party is looking to gain the upperhand whether it’s plausable or just a hunch. Voter ID seems to be the political shuttlecock this year. In light of the voting registration fraud perpetrated in the 2008 election by the Acorn organization, and the projected closeness of the 2012 Presidential election, the Dems are worried that their tactics might be used against them. Voter ID symbolizes a fair measure to the Republicans who feel the Dems might stuff the ballot boxes. Without missing a beat the Dems call Voter ID is racially infused.

    Ex-President Carter a definite progressive/liberal is a proponent of voter ID. Common sense tells us that these measures help to identify fraud. Why would the present Dems want otherwise? You tell me….

Trackbacks

  1. [...] question and one conspicuously empty hall. On the other hand, they did get in at least one spurious accusation of racism and a plea for more abortions, so I guess they could call the whole thing a success.Pin It0BufferNo [...]

  2. [...] interest in expanding the Department of Justice’s authority to block Republican efforts to pass Voter ID laws, legislation that groups such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People [...]

Speak Your Mind

*