The real #WarOnStudents

Some on the Left are saying that “right wing bloggers” only oppose President Obama’s push to keep student loan rates low because it comes from President Obama.

As usual I am unsure whether they are simply being deceptive or that they truly believe they are the only ones that have thought through their political philosophy (I’m not saying they have, I’m just saying they probably think they have).

Sorry, Eric Boehlert, we don’t oppose the president’s philosophy on student loans just because it comes from him. (Boehlert is Senior Fellow at Media Matters for America.)

Those of us who disagree actually believe in this thing called the free market, and another thing called logic. What this means is that we think – as opposed to many on the Left – that a cause has effects that ripple even beyond what any one person or group of people can predict or understand.

The Left arrogantly believes that they can order society, create a commission here or there that will have access to all the appropriate knowledge and come up with “solutions” to economic “problems.”

As Hayek said in Road to Serfdom:

“But if the actions of the state are to be predictable, they must be determined by rules fixed independently of the concrete circumstances which can be neither foreseen nor taken into account beforehand; and the particular effects of such actions will be unpredictable. If, on the other hand, the state were to direct the individual’s actions so as to achieve particular ends, its actions would have to be decided on the basis of the full circumstances of the moment and would therefore be unpredictable.”

The intention of need-based student aid was to help students from low-incomes households afford college. So they beefed up the Pell Grant program and turned the Department of Education into a full-fledged student lender.

What were the consequences? Nicholas Turner did a study while at the University of California (Who benefits from student aid? The economic incidence of tax-based federal student aid) which revealed that private universities matched student aid (specifically need-based grants) dollar for dollar with tuition increases. State schools did the same with their out of state tuition rates.

Legislators have tried dealing with large tuition rate increases with even more Pell Grant money and every year it’s the same thing, the increase in aid is trapped in tuition hikes. Has this helped students from low-income households? No, it has actually hurt them greatly.

Whether students qualify for need-based grants weighs heavily on their decision to attend college. The more aid a student qualifies the more likely they are to attend college.

But here is the rub: once these needy student gets to college they realize they cannot afford the high tuition rates that are largely caused by the increases in Pell Grant. So they take out student loans, mainly from the government.

Why? It is simply because they have the lowest interest rates. These low interests betray to the student that there is not much risk involved with taking out a student loan.

And what do we get? The ever increasing ease with which to take out student loans has led in part to a $1 trillion dollar debt balance, more than any other consumer debt (auto loans, credit card, etc.) and delinquency rates for student loan payments are now estimated at 21 percent!

What does the president want to do? Make it even easier for students to take out loans.

Here we have another instance of the federal government trying to fix a problem that was created by it in the first place (sub-prime mortgages anyone?).

In another study, (Aim High or Go Low? Pricing Strategies and Enrollment Effects When the Net Price Elasticity Varies with Need and Ability) economists Bradley Curs (University of Missouri) and Larry Singell (University of Oregon) advised that two solutions could be employed for the current tuition rate situation: a high aid/high tuition route or a low aid/low tuition route.

So I ask Eric Boehlert and the president, and even congressional Republicans: would you rather subsidize the ever increasing tuition rates in the higher education blob, wasting billions in tax payer money and strapping young people with debt they may hold for the rest of their lives? Or, would you actually like to save the government money (for once) and provide a better future for young people by helping them to avoid debt?

A real war is being waged on young people. One of ignorance (or ill intent; like I said, I’m not sure) from the Left and one of relative spinelessness coming from congressional Republicans on this matter.

Contact (tweet, call etc.) President Obama, Eric Boehlert and your congressman and ask them to stop waging this war of ignorance.

Example: Hey @BarrackObama stop the #WarOnStudents, reform the student aid program.

Or: Hey @EricBoehlert Why do you hate college students? #WarOnStudents

Comments

Comments

  1. Bryan says:

    I’m not quite sure what reform the author is asking for here…

    Student loans may be part of the reason for tuition increasing, it is not the sole cause. We are at a time when a college degree is more valuable than it has ever been. The difference in wages for a college grad and a high school grad are higher than they ever have been, regardless of what you majored in or where you went to school. Sure, the job market is tough right now for recent college grads, but what are we (as a nation) supposed to do when the job market is even worse for those who didn’t go to college.

    Federal subsidized student aid went large scale after World War II with the G.I. Bill, which put an entire generation through school and helped our economy as a result. Tuition didn’t spike back then either. I agree that there needs to be something done about rising tuition, but what is the author asking for here? Raising the interest rate on Stafford Loans? Ending student loans. That seems rather shortsighted and not well-thought out.

  2. geckogal55 says:

    The problem causing high tuition costs is that tuition pays for too much other stuff not directly associated with education, i.e. research, sports, exhorbitant salaries of staff & teachers, scholarships, etc. Remove those costs and take getting an education back to basics would reduce actual tuition costs significantly and make it affordable for everyone. Let private donations pays for sports, research, scholarships & higher salaries.

  3. Milan Moravec says:

    University of California Chancellor says instate tuition is not high enough. University of California Berkeley (UCB) Chancellor Robert J Birgeneau is outspoken on why elite public universities should charge more. With Birgeneau’s leadership flagship UCB is more expensive (on an all-in-cost) than private Harvard and Yale. Cal. is the most expensive public higher education in our country!

    Birgeneau likes to blame the politicians, since they stopped giving him every dollar expected. The Chancellor’s ‘charge more’ instate tuition skyrocketed fees by an average 14% per year from 2006 to 2011-12 academic year. If Birgeneau had allowed fees to rise at the same rate of inflation over the past 10 years they would still be in reach of most middle income students. Increasing funding is not Cal’s solution.

    UCB is a public universities created to maximize access to the widest number of instate students at a reasonable cost: mission of diversity and equality of opportunity. Unfortunately Birgeneau’s ‘charge more’ instate tuition diminishes the equality and inclusion principles which underlie our state and country. Birgeneau’s and Provost George Breslauer’s senior management ‘charge more’ instate tuition denies middle income Californians the transformative value of university education.

    Chancellor Birgeneau’s tenure is a sad unacceptable legacy. University of California Berkeley is now farther and farther out of reach for the sons and daughters of Californians.

    Send your opinion: UC Board of Regents marsha.kelman@ucop.edu and your Calif. State Senator and Assembly member.

Polititainment

Melissa Joan Hart 'not that up on 2016'

The actress, who was vocal about her support for GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney in 2012, told The Hill in a recent interview that she is "not that up on 2016 yet."

Letterman mocks Bernie Sanders

73-year-old Sen. Bernie Sanders, who recently announced he's running for president as a Democrat, is not exactly known for his smooth looks.

Christie ally vs. Kirstie Alley

Friday morning, the news outlet alerted its keen Twitter followers to the fact that Chris Christie ally -- an ally. of. Chris. Christie -- David Wildstein was expected to plead guilty in the scandalous George Washington Bridge "Bridgegate" case that plagued the New Jersey governor last year.

Jeb Bush wants to hang with Pitbull

The likely GOP presidential candidate told TMZ in an impromptu conversation that he would choose two individuals -- one a deceased former president and the other a Cuban-American rapper -- with whom attend a baseball game.

No one wants to dine with Obama

UnitedHealthcare's "100@100" survey released Thursday found that 10-year-old Americans would invite pop stars Taylor Swift and Katy Perry to their parents' dinner party over President Obama.

Video

t u

2016

Melissa Joan Hart unsure who to support in 2016

The actress, who was vocal about her support for GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney in 2012, told The Hill in a recent interview that she is "not that up on 2016 yet."

Anna Wintour comes out for Hillary & against guns
In an interview with New York Magazine, Vogue’s longtime editor and chief Anna Wintour, was asked about how “Hillary balked at the idea of being Vogue” during her 2008 presidential run. Despite being snubbed, Wintour announced she’s ready for Hillary. She said, “I hope so! Of course. Yes. But it’s only just started,” when asked if […]
Bill Clinton: I need speeches to pay bills

Bill Clinton said in an interview with NBC's "Today" that he will continue to deliver paid speeches throughout Hillary's presidential campaign in order to "pay [their] bills."

Carly Fiorina loses her tech cred
Carly Fiorina has 30,000 reasons to frown. Despite saying, “I understand technology, which is a tool to both reimagine government and to re-engage citizens in the process of government,” her campaign team apparently didn’t. CarlyFiorina.org was purchased by Michael Link, assistant director of digital strategy at SEIU, the website now features 30,000 frown faces. One […]
2016 GOP field varies on immigration
Immigration and assimilation took the forefront at the National Review Institute Ideas Summit where the opinions on immigration from the 2016 Republican field could not have been more diverse. Former Gov. Jeb Bush bluntly told immigration hawks including National Review’s editor Richard Lowry, “I love you. I just think you’re wrong.” He even lashed out against […]

Policy

Anna Wintour comes out for Hillary & against guns
In an interview with New York Magazine, Vogue’s longtime editor and chief Anna Wintour, was asked about how “Hillary balked at the idea of being Vogue” during her 2008 presidential run. Despite being snubbed, Wintour announced she’s ready for Hillary. She said, “I hope so! Of course. Yes. But it’s only just started,” when asked if […]
Snowden, Assange, Manning get statues in Berlin

Statue tributes to whistle-blowers are all the rage right now.

Texas proposes tax holiday weekend for gun sales
Tax free weekends usually call to mind back to school shopping, but a new bill in Texas wants to make it much more Second Amendment friendly. The Texas state Senate approved a proposal Thursday 21 to 10 that would create a sales tax holiday for firearms, ammunition and hunting supplies during the last weekend in August, […]
Rand Paul vs. Homeland Security secretary

Rand Paul spent Wednesday going head to head with Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson, demanding to know whether Johnson could justify the government's bulk data collection under the Fourth Amendment.

Seattle's $15 min. wage claims a new victim
Pizza shop worker Devin Jeran was excited about the raise that was coming his way thanks to Seattle’s new $15 an hour minimum wage law. Or at least he was until he found out that it would cost him his job. Jeran will only see a bigger paycheck until August when his boss has to shut […]