Former Obama Student: Obama’s Ignorance of Constitution Embarrassing

Prof. Thom Lambert of the University of Missouri Law School has responded with alarm to President Barack Obama’s attack on the Supreme Court and the power of judicial review by recalling his own days as Obama’s student at the University of Chicago.

Lambert, who writes for the “Truth on the Market” blog, not only studied under Obama, but also clerked for the federal judge who issued an order yesterday demanding that the Department of Justice clarify whether the government believed courts had the power to overturn constitutional laws.

Lambert wrote:

Thus, a Wall Street Journal editorial queried this about the President who “famously taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago”:  “[D]id he somehow not teach the historic case of Marbury v. Madison?”

I actually know the answer to that question.  It’s no (well, technically yes…he didn’t).  President Obama taught “Con Law III” at Chicago.  Judicial review, federalism, the separation of powers — the old “structural Constitution” stuff — is covered in “Con Law I” (or at least it was when I was a student).  Con Law III covers the Fourteenth Amendment.  (Oddly enough, Prof. Obama didn’t seem too concerned about “an unelected group of people” overturning a “duly constituted and passed law” when we were discussing all those famous Fourteenth Amendment cases – Roe v. Wade, Griswold v. Connecticut, Romer v. Evans, etc.)  Of course, even a Con Law professor focusing on the Bill of Rights should know that the principle of judicial review has been alive and well since 1803, so I still feel like my educational credentials have been tarnished a bit by the President’s “unprecedented, extraordinary” remarks.

Read more at Big Government.



  1. test1234 says:

    Today, I went to the beach front with my children. I found a sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She placed the shell to her ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear. She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is totally off topic but I had to tell someone!

    1. Adi says:

      But Suze, the universal deauflt policies were a good way for credit card companies to protect their assets. They allowed the credit card companies to share information and know who was being a bad debtor so they could get as much money as possible from someone who was robbing Peter to pay Paul’, and realistically, those people have a 95% chance of going bankrupt anyway, so the credit card companies were just getting their money, and it’s not just their money. It’s their share holders’ money.

  2. Luis says:

    There is never a penalty to repay sndeutt federal loans early. You should have received something int he mail from them. We have Staffords as well and a few weeks after college started we received a letter snailmail directing us to their website where we had to register and got an ID and we can log onto our account to see our federal loans interest (as we have unsubsidized too) and payment options, online or other ways to pay. You can make any payment anytime you want. So find out about this. Speak to your FA office if needed.

  3. I’m wondering if you have noticed how the media has changed? Now it seems that it is discussed thoroughly and more in depth. Frankly it is about time we see a change.

  4. This is the right Former Obama Student: Obama’s Ignorance of Constitution Embarrassing blog for anyone who wants to assay out out around this matter. You mention so untold its virtually effortful to discourse with you (not that I truly would want…HaHa). You definitely put a new reel on a subject thats been scrivened nigh for life. Prissy push, but eager!