Biased Study Claims People are Conservative Because They’re Uninformed

As it does annually, Gallup recently conducted a poll asking Americans to identify their ideology. For the third year in a row, the results showed that nearly twice as many Americans identify themselves as “conservative” as opposed to “liberal.”

Liberal scholars have often tried to explain these results away by attacking the simplicity of conservative beliefs.  The latest incarnation of this attack is that conservatism tends to be the natural position of someone who has not had “the time or energy to give a matter sufficient thought.”

This suggestion is based on a study from University of Arkansas psychologist Scott Eidelman.  The study essentially tested the way that the ideologies of individuals were influenced by constraints such as time, alcohol impairment and distraction. The researcher’s main conclusion appears to be “that when effortful thought is disengaged, the first step people take tends to be in a conservative direction.”

The suggested implication of this conclusion is that much of conservatism’s support is based on individuals not really thinking things through.

Quite a few things are wrong with this explanation.  First, the study does not really address the political ideologies of Americans. The Gallup survey was not conducted under similar constraints. Individuals who participate in that survey have had their whole lives to determine what ideology suits them, including many moments where “effortful thought”  was required, and they were not disengaged. In addition to some serious concerns about methodology of the survey (the study was based on extremely low sample sizes and limited locations), this conclusion doesn’t necessarily fit the research.

The researchers seem to ignore other possible and more likely explanations for the results. That’s where the study becomes less about science and more about explaining away a fact that the researchers find inconvenient.

There is no actual evidence within the research that there is a lack of meaningful thought leading constrained individuals to lean toward more conservative positions. In fact, an explanation that is equally probable is that much of conservative ideology is based in common sense; therefore it takes much less effort for someone to arrive at that position.

Liberalism is rooted in the idea that others can make better decisions for an individual than they can make for themselves, and it often depends on deceptive rhetorical framing, extensive obfuscation of issues and selective facts to enforce that belief.

Therefore it would be a perfectly justifiable and at least equally fitting conclusion that when individuals are constrained – and therefore not influenced by the various outside framings on particular issues – they would revert to their natural position of applied common sense. This is just one possible conclusion that could have fit the research just as easily.

The study provides no definitive answers as to why so many Americans more identify themselves with a conservative ideology as opposed to a liberal one or why that is a more instinctive position for many.  One thing that does seem to be certain is the researchers should be giving more “sufficient thought” to how their biases are constraining them from making proper conclusions.

Comments

Comments

  1. scott says:

    do your homework and actually read the article.

    1. the authors never made any connection between gallup polls and their research (you’re getting confused with a journalist’s speculation).

    2. the methodology was completely sound, and more than adequate for basic hypothesis testing.

    3. there *is* direct evidence for the role of effortful thought in producing the results – all studies, especially study 4 (where mediation is used)

    4. common sense is completely consistent with the authors explanation, and not an “alternative” one.same goes for the

    6. the author of this post should give more sufficient thought to what he claims to be knowledgeable of, and actually read the article before taking other people’s misinformed conclusions as those of the researchers.

The 'Notorious RBG' takes over SNL
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg gives pretty hilarious and biting interviews in real life — “not 100 percent sober” ringing any bells? — but Kate McKinnon’s version of the “Notorious RBG” on Saturday Night Live’s “Weekend Update” may just take the cake. From jokes about her morning exercise routine to her sexy dreams about […]
Jimmy Kimmel 'censors' Obama

Thanks to some mischievous editing from Jimmy Kimmel, these originally innocent TV clips will put your mind straight in the gutter.

Jon Stewart: Fox News is 'killing' him

As his days on the Daily Show wind down, Jon Stewart wants to make sure we are all aware how much he really, really hates Fox News.

Jay Carney is going to work for Amazon

Imagining an Amazon customer service call with Jay Carney on the line.

Ron Swanson, libertarian visionary

We're sad to say that "Parks and Rec" has aired its finale episode, leaving a Pawnee-shaped hole in our hearts.

White House

Calling for cooperation, Obama engages in confrontation

WASHINGTON (AP) — Amid appeals for bipartisanship, President Barack Obama in just three days has provoked Republicans on issues as disparate as immigration, Wall Street and the Keystone XL pipeline — a combative mix of defense and offense that underscores Washington's political realignment.

It’s on: Obama follows through and vetoes Keystone pipeline

Defying the Republican-run Congress, President Barack Obama rejected a bill Tuesday to approve construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline, wielding his veto power for only the third time in his presidency.

Biden: The middle class is ‘being killed,’ in worse shape than any time since the ’20s

Joe Biden—everyone’s favorite creeper and truth-bomb-dropper.

MSNBC Host: Obama’s terrorism summit is a ‘dog and pony show’
You know it’s bad when President Obama has even lost the support of MSNBC. MSNBC Host Andrea Mitchell basically called the White House’s Summit on “Countering Violent Extremism” a farce during her show Wednesday. “Here he has the summit, no heads of government coming, the participation has not been at a particularly high level. We’ll have […]
Obama assures ‘almost complete confidence’ there have been no NSA abuses

The president’s interview with Re/code over the weekend touched on privacy issues, with Obama insisting with “almost complete confidence” that there have been no abuses of the government’s vast surveillance program.

Congress

Rand Paul calls on Hillary to retire

Rand Paul’s speech at CPAC Friday felt a lot like a campaign rally—and the crowd left little room to doubt that they wanted it that way, breaking out into chants of “President Paul! President Paul!” at least three times over the course of his remarks.

Cruz: Obama, Carter similarities 'uncanny'
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has his sights set on 2016, but he is not very optimistic about what will happen both at home and abroad in the mean time. Cruz laid out his predictions for the direction he believes President Obama is leading the country in during a round table event with reporters and bloggers […]
Cruz calls Lynch vote 'heartbreaking'
Loretta Lynch won approval from a key Senate committee Thursday to serve as the nation’s next attorney general, as divided Republicans clashed over her support for President Barack Obama’s immigration policies. The 12 to 8 vote in the Judiciary Committee sent Lynch’s nomination to the full Senate. Three Republicans joined all committee Democrats in voting “yes.” […]
It's Warren 2015, not '16

There seems to be a lot of talk about political "branding" lately. Allow Elizabeth Warren to take a crack at it.

Rand Paul calls Giuliani comments

Rand Paul pushed back on Rudy Giuliani’s controversial comments about Obama’s lack of patriotism, saying he prefers to question policy rather than motive.