As expected, Wisconsin Republican Rep. Paul Ryan endorsed Mitt Romney this morning, making the announcement in an appearance on Fox and Friends.
The timing of his decision coincides with the recent end of Ryan’s stint as chairman of the Republican National Committee presidential trust, “which made it difficult for him to pick a horse in the 2012 election,” according to Political Ticker.
As AP wrote last night, Ryan’s endorsement is yet another signal — especially following Marco Rubio’s like endorsement — that GOP leaders and Tea Party darlings alike have decided to coalesce around Mitt Romney — and that it can now “kinda sorta” be considered “conservative” to vote for Mitt Romney. Ryan, whose budget proposal just passed the House yesterday by a vote of 228 to 191, is known as a bold legislator whose twin priorities of economic growth and entitlement reform very well could be the key to turning the country’s fiscal outlook around. Ryan is also popular in his home state, where Romney already has a sizable lead in the polls.
In the general election, a Ryan endorsement could actually be a liability of sorts. Democrats are notoriously apt to demagogue Ryan’s budget, commonly reciting the claim that it would “end Medicare as we know it.” Never mind that simple math will end Medicare as we know it if Congress takes no step to reform the broken program! In fact, the Democratic National Committee has already released an ad that mocks the supposed “bromance” between Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan.
Among the many misleading lyrics, this shameless line appears in the ad: “When they meet to prepare / ways to end Medicare / that’s amoré.” With Debbie Wasserman Schultz at the helm of the DNC, though, I’d expect nothing less ridiculous.
About Editorial Staff
or is it an independent rlfoectien?It was intended to reference a prior issue. It’s of no consequence anymore.Qualia manifest strategies e28094As in e2809cshows strategiese2809d?Yeah, or display.to rephrase Sartree28099s way of looking at the issue. Qualia are to a script as thinking is to a directore28099s choice between scripts.Lete28099s see: thinking is the means by which a director chooses a script, so qualia is the means by which a scripte280a6(The analogy seems incomplete.)Qualia are different forms of expressions, like themes. (Critical) thinking is relative to Qualia to compare and contrast the different themes without being absorbed into one of them. Communicative action, for instance, takes place in a Space pre-Qualia. But it still expresses itself, albeit through pure reason. I think this represents interaction’ the formal concept you mention. All Qualia is grounded in interaction’ (logic). Here, one can see the sense of there’s no escaping endoxa’ (). A concept Ms. Rand bungled. To the analogy: the themes are represented in scripts (language-games) and critical thinking is to see the interrelationship between games, like a film director will instruct an actor to posture in a different way because the previous posture is an instrument in an irrelevant language-game. I done28099t recognize this idea of e2809cthe physical as some kind of basic elemente2809d as representing my view. Can you explain what you mean?You say there’s too much of the thinking process that we know to be a physical activity [...] How can a physical activity not take place between physical elements?9c78