Deadline Extended

Know a young conservative who should be on Red Alert's 2015 '30 Under 30' List? Nominate them by May 29.

What to Watch For When Supreme Court Hears Obamacare Arguments

On March 26th, the Supreme Court will begin hearing three days of oral arguments on the constitutionality of Obamacare.  Some legal experts are calling the decision the Roe v. Wade of our generation, and that’s probably not an exaggeration.

The primary question before the Court is whether the commerce clause in Article I of the Constitution authorizes Congress to mandate that individuals purchase health insurance.  This boils down to how the court defines “economic activity.”

The Justices must decide whether an individual’s decision to forgo health insurance becomes economic activity by virtue of the fact that at some point in their lives they must participate in the healthcare market.  The slippery slope potential of that reasoning should be obvious: just about anything Americans choose to purchase or not purchase has some broader economic consequence.

Former Bush Solicitor General Paul Clement, advocate for the 26-state coalition challenging the law, can be expected to focus extensively on this lack of a “limiting principal.”  If Congress can regulate Americans who intentionally chose not to engage in commerce, then Congress’ power is essentially without limit.  Thus, the Court’s ultimate opinion has the potential to either make or break the idea that the Constitution restricts Congress’ authority to limited enumerated powers.

The big question for legal observers is whether Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Anton Scalia, Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Anthony Kennedy will reveal their leanings during the arguments.  Count on the questions and demeanor of these Justices to be closely scrutinized for any hints as to their ultimate decision.

The Obama administration only needs to convince one of the four Justices mentioned above to win the case, as the four liberal Justices are almost certain to uphold the law.

Despite the usual critique of Justices as strict political partisans, there’s no guarantee that all of the “conservatives” on the Court will strike down Obamacare’s individual mandate.

Both Roberts and Scalia have written prior opinions that hint that they could be convinced of the mandate’s constitutionality.  In fact, The Hill reported last week that the Department of Justice is shifting its legal arguments in the case to arguments that Justice Scalia has previously endorsed.  Roberts is also on record supporting the view that Congress has some powers that are not specifically delegated by the Constitution.

Alito’s views on the relevant issues in the case are anyone’s guess.

Justice Kennedy, the Court’s usual swing vote, is probably the most likely to side with the liberal wing.  Constitutional scholar Erwin Chemerinsky joked to The Washington Post that he would “put Justice Kennedy’s photo on the cover” of the Court briefs if the rules allowed it.

If the court overturns the individual mandate, it would be a major repudiation of the liberal theory of governance which assumes that Congress should be given virtually unlimited discretion in addressing economic problems.  On the other hand, if the individual mandate is upheld, the Court’s conservative revolution is more or less dead.  The stakes couldn’t be higher.

Comments

Comments

  1. [...] of the unpopular law. Democrats are eager to shift the public’s opinion of the law before the Supreme Court hears testimony next week on the constitutionality of the law, which Republicans argue (and at least one Congressional Democrat admits) went outside the [...]

  2. Dboy says:

    Sarah Palin caused all that? This from a woman that the lfitest news media and politicians have repeatedly declared inept? Think what she could have done if she were ept . I believe the reason that people fear a possible death panel is the government’s habit of letting programs morph into something other than their original intent.SSI was intended to be insurance for the truly poor so that they would have at least something in their old age. Now it’s a retirement program for everyone.Medicare was to be safety net for the truly indigent, now it’s an entitlement program that includes capable people that can’t be bothered with using their tattoo and piercing money for their babies food.Obamacare is full of vague regulations that can be just as easily modified.

Polititainment

Anti-Stephanopoulos artwork invades NYC

Posters depicting ABC News anchor George Stephanopolous and a smiling Hillary Clinton with the words "PayPal" and "Donate" written on them have been popping up close to the studio where ABC shoots Good Morning America.

Rubio gets first celeb endorsement

The Florida senator and official GOP candidate for president has just received a big celebrity endorsement from Rick Harrison of the popular show "Pawn Stars," according to a report in the Las Vegas Sun.

Snoop Dogg endorses Hillary Clinton

Snoop Dogg became the latest rapper to endorse the Democratic presidential candidate during his appearance on Bravo's "Watch What Happens Live" over the weekend.

John Oliver shocked by House NSA reform

John Oliver was shocked to hear that the House recently passed NSA reform.

Introducing the 2016 SNL primary

The weekend comedy show has been skewering candidates for president left and right -- some more than others -- so much so that we thought it a good idea to track the program's focus on specific candidates.

Video

t u

2016

Are LinkedIn users ready for Hillary?

The presidential hopeful announced her arrival to the professional social networking site on Thursday with a post listing “Four Ways to Jump-Start Small Business.”

Clinton Foundation got $26M in undisclosed payments

The Clinton Foundation on Thursday made public that it received up to $26.4 million in previously undisclosed payments from corporations, universities, and even foreign sources, according to the Washington Post.

Clinton got now-classified Benghazi info on email

WASHINGTON (AP) Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton received information on her private email server about the deadly attack on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi that has now been classified.

Clinton hires illegal immigrant to campaign staff

According to the New York Times, the Clinton campaign announced Wednesday that it has hired Lorella Praeli, an illegal immigrant and "Dreamer" activist, to spearhead Hispanic outreach for Hillary ahead of 2016.

AP reporter: Hillary only talking to supporters

According to Associated Press reporter Julie Pace, the small events that have made up the bulk of Hillary's presidential campaign thus far have involved the Democratic candidate only interacting with Americans who support her and not a more representative fraction of the actual U.S. population.

Policy

Professor: Americans can't handle owning guns

In an op-ed for The Dallas Morning News, Prof. John Traphagan, who teaches religious studies and anthropology at the University of Texas at Austin, demands that Americans give up gun ownership after several tragic, high-profile shootings that have taken place recently.

Obama: Climate change is a security 'threat'

Obama spoke of global warming's looming threat during his commencement address to the U.S. Coast Guard Academy in New London, Connecticut, Wednesday.

Poll: Most Americans highly value privacy

For all the talk about “privacy,” the word “privacy” can sometimes be a nebulous concept, about which people hold contradictory views.

Poll: Dems support federal ban on hate speech
It seems that a lot of Americans don’t think that freedom of speech should be protected anymore. A poll released Wednesday by YouGov has found that a small majority of the American public support limiting the First Amendment if it means banning hate speech. The poll, conducted in early May, asked respondents whether they would support […]
Rand Paul filibuster highlights

In the end, Rand Paul’s Patriot Act filibuster failed to crack his previous record, clocking in at roughly 10.5 hours.